There Is 1 Difference Between The Sex Scenes in ‘Breaking Dawn: Part 1’ and ‘Part 2,’ According to Robert Pattinson – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Every Twilight movie has a few things that stick out to viewers. A couple of things that many remember that particular movie for. Maybe its the line, Ya likin the rain girl? in Twilight if youre going for a deep cut. Or maybe its the way Bella breaks her hand on Jacobs face in Eclipse.

But for Breaking Dawn Part 1 its most likely the wedding and the sex scenes. Because thats basically all that happens. There are other interesting parts, yes, but the big things that many might remember, especially between Edward and Bella, are those two. And then for Breaking Dawn Part 2 its the vampire sex scenes (maybe) and the ending.

RELATED:Stephenie Meyer Would Change When Edward Cullen Says 3 Words To Bella Swan in Twilight; It Should Have Happened Much Sooner

First off, though, to even get to the intimate scenes between Edward and Bella, the two had to go through three movies of nonstop angst and obstacles. Of course, sexual tension and a little bit of second-guessing for a minute there, too.

It all paid off in the end, but for Kristen Stewart, three movies of not having a sex scene made actually filming one a bit odd.

It was so weird, it didnt even feel like we were doing a scene within a Twilight film, Stewart said in 2011, according to People. I was like, Bella! What are you doing? Wow! What is happening here?! It was very surreal.

But still, it happened. And her character, Bella, could not have been happier that it did. So what was the difference between the two sex scenes? Vampires, duh.

The sex is a lot wilder and more intense but I think it works better, Pattinson said in 2012, according to Marie Claire UK. He was talking about how the intimate scenes in the second part differed. And if you watch them back, thats kind of made clear by the mystical effects put around Bellas face, the slow-motion here and there, and the overall lighting and camera work they did.

Pattinson also told NBC News that year that it couldnt just be a normal sex scene. They had to be inventive because it was supposed to be about, like, the greatest vampire sex youve ever had. Well, no one has had vampire sex, so they probably have viewers all convinced regardless.

With all this talk of vampire kanoodling, a friendly reminder that all of these movies are still PG-13. And the books were all meant for tweens and teens. So production made sure to keep a closeup on the actors faces so that they didnt get too graphic with these scenes.

Its awkward doing close-ups in front of a big crew with the camera operator in your face and youre supposed to show ultimate ecstasy, Pattinson said, Marie Claire UK reported. Kristen and I would start to laugh and the cameraman was laughing, too.

Some scenes had to be reshot, according to People and director Bill Condon in 2011. Apparently, there was some thrusting going on from Stewart that wasnt up to the MPAAs guidelines on the PG-13 front.

Its almost clinical the kind of strict guidelines [the MPAA] have about anything that appears to be, Condon stated.

RELATED: Kristen Stewart Was the Reason the Twilight: Breaking Dawn Sex Scenes Had To Be Reshot

See the rest here:
There Is 1 Difference Between The Sex Scenes in 'Breaking Dawn: Part 1' and 'Part 2,' According to Robert Pattinson - Showbiz Cheat Sheet